Showing posts with label Vancouver Olympic Village. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vancouver Olympic Village. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

A YEAR IN REVIEW AND A LOOK AHEAD –TD Bank

REGIONAL HOUSING MARKETS:
A YEAR IN REVIEW AND A LOOK AHEAD


Gradual unwinding of the over-valuation in house prices across the country


Highlights

  • As the year draws to a close, we conclude that the Canadian housing market put forth a respectable showing. Annual price gains are estimated at 7.5% in 2011 and sales’ growth ought to come
    in positive as well, but at a much more modest pace of 2.2%.
  • Behind the headline figure, we have seen gains in prices and sales activity decelerate in recent months. Some of the underlying factors include tighter insured mortgage financing rules and weakened
    confidence related to the stability of the economic recovery. Helping cushion the impact of these negative forces has been the persistence of low mortgage rates.
  • We believe that the average Canadian home price is over-valued by roughly 10%. Metrics like price to income, price to rent, and affordability all support this conclusion. We expect that the price excess will gradually unwind over the next two years in light of a softening in employment conditions in 2012 followed by higher interest rates in 2013.
  • In contrast to the resale market, starts continue to come in well above expectations. The strength witnessed over the last few years has been driven exclusively by the multi-residential category. Consistent with weaker resale markets, we expect new starts to trend toward 170,000-180,000 units in the 2012-13 period.
  • In addition to our national perspective, we provide an in-depth forecast of twelve major markets. While no urban centre will be immune to the macroeconomic and interest rate headwinds, Calgary and Edmonton are likely to do better than the rest. By contrast, a larger-than-average price and sales correction looks to be in store for both Toronto and Vancouver.

Homebuyers came out in the early part of 2011 to take advantage of record-low interest rates and to beat out changes to new insured mortgage financing rules. With Canadians bringing forward their purchases and national job gains tapering off since the autumn, the past few months have recorded more modest price and sales gains. In all, 2011 put forth a very respectable showing with price appreciation
clocking in at an estimated 7.5% and sales growth also positive, but at a more modest 2.2%. At around 190,000 units, housing starts also continued to come in above long-run averages.

Looking ahead, we anticipate a tug-of-war action to take hold in the Canadian real estate market.  At one of the rope is the magnetism of low interest rates; at the other end are subdued prospects for economic, income and employment growth. Ultimately, we expect the economic side of the equation to win out over the near-term. In particular, the first half of 2012 is likely to be characterized by ongoing
confidence-sapping events in Europe, global financial turbulence and slowing world economic growth.

While housing activity is expected to do somewhat better in the second half of the year, as external clouds start to dissipate, rising Canadian interest rates in 2013 should erect the next road block in the way of housing markets. Overall, we expect sales to record annual average declines of 2.4% and 3.5% in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Prices are poised to suffer a similar fate – annual average declines of 1.9% in 2012 and 3.6% in 2013. Starts should dip to an average 170,000 to 180,000 units in 2012-13. Collectively, these adjustments will gradually erase the over-valuation in the marketplace.

While no urban center will be immune from economic volatility and higher prevailing interest rates, some regions are expected to do better than others over the next two years. Among the twelve major markets profiled in this report, Calgary and Edmonton ought to lead the pack. Solid economic fundamentals and the absence of a recent
run-up in prices support our call. Toronto and Vancouver do not appear to be as lucky – we have them experiencing a greater-than-average correction in both sales and prices over the next two years.

Canada’s housing market defies the odds in 2011

In 2011, the national housing market turned in a respectable performance despite some notable hurdles. In the spring, the federal government responded to growing signs of excessive household indebtedness by announcing a further tightening in the rules surrounding insured mortgages.
In order to beat this announced change, we suspect that many homebuyers brought forward their purchases earlier in the year. In the summer, a combination of concerns about European sovereign debt, a U.S. government credit rating downgrade and worries about the global recovery led to increased uncertainty. Businesses have responded by reducing hiring in Canada since the autumn. Yet, home sales are headed for their seventh gain in ten years; prices are on tap to see their ninth gain in ten years. Still, a closer look at the data shows that activity in most of Canada’s major markets has moved past its peak and has since landed softly.

Average residential prices have also been skewed by outsized strength in Vancouver and to a lesser extent, Toronto. If we were to exclude these two major markets, the price and resale activity gains would be much more muted than the headline number would suggest.
In the new home market, starts have fallen from their peak levels of 229,000 recorded in 2007. But at an estimated 192,000 new starts in 2011, readings continue to remain well above demographic fundamentals, which we calculate to be 180,000 units. Similar to the resale side of the story, the national numbers have been skewed disproportionately by strong performances in large urban markets, notably Toronto. If we were to exclude Toronto from the national tally, total starts would have declined significantly in 2011.

TD 1

 

TD 2

Metrics point to over-valuation embedded in home
prices today

As we recast our focus on where the housing market is headed, there has been considerable attention given to the extent of over-valuation in Canadian home prices. There is no definitive measure that one can point to quantify the degree of excess (with absolute certainty) imbedded in average residential prices in Canada today. Each measure carries with it some underlying concern about the conclusions that can be made. For example, if we use the average price-torrent ratio as a benchmark, it would tell us that homes are
over-inflated by as much as 75% relative to the long-run average. However, the ratio inherently ignores the impact of changing mortgage rates, the presence of provincial rent control measures, and a potential divergence in quality between owned and rental accommodation.

Taking a look at just real home prices would lead to a conclusion that houses are priced more than 60% higher than the long-run average. Still, historical prices do not factor in key structural changes over time, such as lower trend mortgage rates, longer amortization periods, rising land values, transit development nearby, improved home quality and rising incomes. The price-to-income measure attempts to take income movements into consideration, but still does not capture some of the other factors previously presented. Based on this measure, prices are 44% over-valued. A more defensible measure assumes that total housing costs relative to income eventually revert back to a long term average. If we use this measure and assume a return to more normal levels of interest rates, the degree of overvaluation would be around 10-15%. Given the behavior of sales and price trends in recent years – one that does not share bubble-like characteristics such as those in the U.S. pre-2007 – we are comfortable with this estimate of national price over-valuation.

Less supportive factors on tap for housing


When we look ahead to our 2012-13 forecast period, we see that the headwinds facing both supply and demand will increase in intensity. In turn, we anticipate resale price froth to gradually evaporate leaving the market in a more balanced position relative to where it stands today. More specifically, we expect both sales and prices to record annual average declines in both 2012 and 2013, with the latter year expected to record the brunt of the hit. Several factors support our forecasts, which we briefly delve into next.

TD 3

Modest economic, income and employment growth over
short-term

Real GDP growth in Canada is estimated at a solid 2.4% in 2011. However, storm clouds will increasingly hang over our small open economy during the first half of 2012. Much of the risk surrounds the European sovereign debt crisis and the failure of politicians to take decisive action so far to pour water over the flame. The base case scenario embedded in our forecast includes a recession within Europe, coming to a climax in early 2012 when borrowing pressures and requirements will be heightened. Financial market volatility and a
global economic slowdown will likely play out as a result. In this context and given our export-based economy, real GDP growth is projected to slow to a minimal 1% on average during the first half of 2012. With these headline numbers, the national unemployment rate is expected to increase from 7.3% to 7.7% by the middle of next year.
National employment growth is also poised to be sub-1.0%, on a quarterly basis, during the first half of the year, while gains in after-tax incomes will be significantly restrained.

Prices and sales tend to be negatively correlated with financial market volatility and job and economic uncertainty – a house is too big an asset for most families to jump into when job security is in question and financial portfolios are vulnerable to sizeable swings in total value. As a consequence, resale prices and sales are expected to decline during the first half of 2012, before the turbulence eases in the months thereafter. In our forecast, we make the explicit assumption that – faced with a mounting crisis – leaders in Europe ultimately take bold action to address the situation, thus delivering benefits to financial markets and economies around the world. As such, Canada’s economy and job market is likely to regain traction in the second half of 2012 and into 2013, with real GDP growth rebounding to above 2.0%.

At the regional level, we believe the resource-based provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador will continue to carry the best economic prospects over the 2012-13 period. The manufacturing-heavy regions of Ontario, Québec and Manitoba are expected to come in close to the national average. Last but not least, the Maritime provinces should see sub-par numbers over the next two years, with Nova Scotia being the as shipbuilding work gets underway.

 

Below is the full report:

Cat: Canada Real Estate

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Surrey rated B.C.'s hottest housing investment market

Surrey rated B.C.'s hottest housing investment market

Surrey is the hottest market for housing investment in British Columbia, according to a rating by Real Estate Investment Network.

REIN, a leading real estate research organization, ranked Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows No. 2, with Kamloops holding the third spot.

Vancouver was ranked No. 11, after No. 10 Prince George.

REIN said its report, Top British Columbia Investment Towns 2011, looks at the prospects for real estate investment opportunities across the province, and identifies the top regions that will outperform in the coming decade.

REIN said in a news release that the report looks at such factors as:

Is the area's population growing faster than the provincial average?

Are new infrastructures being built to handle that growth?

Is the area creating new jobs and taking steps to maintain current employment levels?

Will the area benefit from an economic or real estate ripple effect?

Has political leadership created an economic growth atmosphere?

Are there major transportation improvements in the works?

The top towns ranked in the report are:

No. 1: Surrey

No. 2: Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows

No. 3: Kamloops

No. 4: Abbotsford

No. 5: Fort St. John

No. 6: Dawson Creek

No. 7: Kelowna

No. 8: Comox Valley

No. 9: Penticton

No. 10: Prince George

No. 11: Vancouver

 

Surrey Real Estate

 

Cat: Surrey Real Estate

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Photography by Lyon's photostream

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

HOUSING PRICES Comparison in Vancouver West

 

HOUSING PRICES: VANCOUVER WEST DETACHEDvancouver ex
OCT. 2011: $2,008,702
OCT. 2010: $1,627,887
OCT. 2009: $1,491,294
OCT. 2008: $1,279,528
OCT. 2007: $1,370, 560
OCT. 2006: $1,129,974


HOUSING PRICES: VANCOUVER WEST ATTACHED
OCT. 2011: $857,108
OCT. 2010: $753,614
OCT. 2009: $722,981
OCT. 2008: $630,738
OCT. 2007: $697,396
OCT. 2006: $628,693

Cat: Vancouver Real Estate

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Canadian Home prices doubled during decade

 

The caliber of Metro Vancouver’s existing housing stock is a big reason average home prices soared 128 per cent from 2000 to 2010, from $296,000 to $676,000, according to a Re/Max report released Monday.
“While supply and demand, population growth and rising foreign investment, have been the main underpinnings behind exceptional gains, revitalization — amid an aging housing stock — and newer construction instruction are largely underestimated factors propping up housing values in Canada’s real estate hot spot,” the real estate company’s Housing Evolution Report concluded.
“Just over one-quarter of Vancouver’s owned housing stock was constructed prior to 1970, while 44 per cent was built before 1980.
“With a significant proportion of older homes, renovation spending has been on the rise throughout the past decade — in tandem with home sales — as owners, vendors and purchasers breathe new life into Vancouver’s existing housing.”
Infill housing also boosted values as smaller homes on valuable lots were torn down to build large, upper-end homes.
The report cited the region’s building boom, with a strong focus on condo construction and small-lot subdivisions.

“The upswing is captured by the total value of residential building permits over the past decade — at $35 billion. Permit values climbed consistently from 2001 – 2007, cresting in 2007, before sliding back during the 2008/2009 recession. Yet, the subsequent rebound was quite impressive, as the value of building permits nearly doubled against year-ago levels in 2010, as builders got back to business.”
Condos now represent one in every two sales, with an average price of $457,887.


“Condominiums are undeniably the biggest game changer for real estate over the past decade, especially in British Columbia and Alberta, where they comprise 25 to 50 per cent of residential sales,” noted Elton Ash, regional executive vice-president, Re/Max of Western Canada.
Prices are continuing to rise and will continue doing so, the report added.
“Average price in Greater Vancouver currently hovers at $791,332 — up 18 per cent year-to-date — and is expected to continue its ascent in the months ahead.”
Over 26,000 homes have sold so far this year, an increase of nine per cent.
Three B.C. urban areas were addressed in the Re/Max report, which concluded that Kelowna saw the greatest average price increase over the decade, rising 156 per cent from $188,000 in 2010 to $481,000 in 2010, with new construction the biggest factor.
However, today’s average Kelowna price has dropped slightly to $475,250. “The market remains off peak levels, but confidence is slowly returning, and listings are starting to decline.”
For Victoria, the average price climbed 123.5 per cent from $225,731 to $504,561.
Nationally, the value of a Canadian home has risen 106 per cent since 2000, from $163,951 to $339,030 in 2010, with 10 of the 16 urban markets surveyed experiencing increases of more than 100 per cent. The highest was Regina (173 per cent) and the lowest, London-St. Thomas (68 per cent).
The report said that the value of residential building permits issued nationally in the 10 years was $340 billion, while $450 billion was spent on renovations.

Cat: Canada Real Estate

Friday, November 4, 2011

To buy or rent: that is the question

 

In a report earlier this year, Royal Bank of Canada chief economist Craig Wright suggested home ownership for a growing number of Canadians has become an impossible dream. That’s certainly true in Vancouver, where the affordability index is at record highs, with the average home price at nearly 10 times the median income.

But perhaps ownership has been oversold as an aspirational goal. As thousands of Americans have discovered, sometimes the dream becomes a nightmare.

In the United States, home ownership wasn’t just a dream, it was held up as an inalienable right. Washington pressured financial institutions to lend money to almost anyone who asked, giving rise to the NINJA mortgage (no income, no job, no assets).

Because mortgage interest was (and still is) tax deductible, homeowners did not bear the full burden of borrowing. Financial institutions turned to the wizards of Wall Street to devise derivatives that might mitigate the heightened risk.

The U.S. government had already sanctioned mortgage-based securities, having set up the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) in 1968 and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac) in 1970 to expand the secondary market for mortgages.

Inevitably, homeowners without the means to repay their debts defaulted on their mortgages and the derivatives based on them, including mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations, became worthless. Not knowing the extent of exposure to toxic debt, financial institutions became reluctant to lend to each other.

The result was a credit crisis that plunged much of the world into recession.to-buy-or-rent

The housing crash that crippled the U.S. didn’t happen in Canada for several reasons. For a start, more prudent lending practices prevented the emergence of a significant subprime mortgage market. Canada’s regulatory regime acted as a rudder that kept the financial services industry on an even keel. And besides the capital gains exemption on the sale of a principal residence, there is no particular tax advantage in owning a home in Canada.

Measures mistakenly introduced to loosen mortgage lending rules — such as interest-only loans and 40-year amortizations — were quickly reversed, forestalling a flood of overly leveraged households.

However, while Canada doesn’t idealize home ownership to the extent the U.S. does, it is still perceived as preferable to renting. Owning is seen as permanent, renting transient, the implication being that ownership contributes more to community stability.

Owners are thought to be more involved in community activities than renters, adding to social cohesion. The pride of ownership is viewed as a motivator for owners to maintain their properties, while renters supposedly lack this incentive. There is scant research to support any of these contentions.

In any case, Canadians have pursued the holy grail of home ownership with as much zeal as their American cousins and have achieved similar rates of both ownership and indebtedness.

Canadian households, on average, now carry nearly $1.50 of debt for every dollar of income. Most of that debt is mortgage debt. Historically low interest rates have enticed buyers to get into the real estate market or to upgrade to more expensive homes. That, along with increasing real estate investment from outside Canada, especially from mainland China, has driven home prices in B.C. to record levels.

Overpriced

Vancouver lays claim to the highest median house prices in Canada and Forbes magazine ranks the city’s real estate market as the sixth most overpriced in the world. (Forbes calculated an annualized rate of return on property based on cash flows from renting, then flipped the result to produce the equivalent of a price-to-earnings ratio. Vancouver’s was 26.8; Monaco was No. 1 at 74.1.)

Each quarter RBC publishes an affordability index that examines the cost of ownership relative to household income. Most recently, it found the cost of mortgage payments, utilities and property taxes for a detached bungalow in Vancouver amounted to 92.5 per cent of a typical household’s monthly income.

“Vancouver’s housing market is without a doubt the most stressed in Canada and is facing the highest risk of a downturn,” Wright said in the affordability report.

That real estate in Vancouver is expensive is not news.

A 2008 study by Tsur Somerville, professor of real estate finance at the Sauder School of Business at the University of British Columbia, and his research assistant, Kitson Swann, determined that house prices in Vancouver would have to fall by 11 per cent to be in balance with rents; in other words, for the price-to-rent ratio to be in equilibrium.

The study assumes that the housing market is in equilibrium when the ratio of house rents to prices equals the sum of mortgage rates and cost of holding a house minus the expected long-run rate of price appreciation. House prices above their equilibrium level doesn’t guarantee they will fall, the study says. But the potential for decline is greatest in cities that have built more units than can be absorbed by the growth in households.

“Recent data,” it adds, “suggests that Vancouver is most at risk in this regard.”

A two-bedroom-plus-den, two-bathroom, 1,500-square-foot townhouse in North Vancouver was recently listed for rent at $2,200 a month. Another townhouse of similar size in the same complex was offered for sale at $649,900. The price to rent ratio of 24.6 suggests that either the property is overvalued or the rent is too low. Trulia.com, a U.S. real estate website, says a ratio of 21 or more means it’s better to rent than to buy.

Analyze this data as an investor would by dividing the annual rent by the capital cost of the property and the return — or rental yield — is 4.1 per cent. With Government of Canada benchmark bond yields trending below three per cent, an investor might consider this an adequate ROI. But mortgage payments with 25 per cent down, a 25-year amortization and a variable interest rate of three per cent would amount to roughly $2,300, which turns this into a losing proposition, even before taxes and maintenance expenses.

According to Forbes magazine, “the relationship between rental yields and housing costs matters because a low rental yield is a good indication of a stretched market — one that has a bubble — since these markets are more likely to face downward price pressures or grow at a slower rate.”

Based on the numbers then, one might draw the conclusion that Vancouver is a real estate bubble. But bubbles don’t always burst; sometimes they slowly deflate. A few analysts believe that fate awaits Vancouver.

TD Bank, for instance, forecast this summer that average house prices in Metro Vancouver will decline by 14.8 per cent by the end of 2013, but will still be worth more than they were in 2010.

A place to call home

Would-be buyers and renters can while away hours by Googling the term “buy or rent calculator” and working through various scenarios.

 

However, the majority of home buyers aren’t thinking about the return on investment on an asset, they’re looking for a place to raise a family, close to schools and shopping, maybe with a yard, a deck for the barbecue and a basketball hoop on the garage: a place to call home.

 

These misty-eyed buyers might do better than you imagine.

Consider that North Vancouver listing with the high price-to-rent ratio and low yield. If they were to rent at $2,200 a month with annual rent increases of two per cent, they’d pay $289,072 over 10 years.

If they could come up with $162,500 (for 25 per cent down) and borrow $480,000 at today’s historically low rate of three per cent (and pay $900 a year on upkeep), they’d pay $281,589.

If the house appreciated by seven per cent a year and the cost of selling it was seven per cent, the appreciation value would be $1,278,451. They’d come out ahead by $867,080.

It would take a savvy investor to beat that under current stock, bond, currency or commodity market conditions. At the same time, it is risky to have so much capital tied up in a single immovable and relatively illiquid asset.

In the final analysis, whether it is better to buy or to rent depends not so much on interest rates and ratios but rather on an individual’s goals in life. For some, home ownership is a ball and chain; for others, it is fulfillment of a dream.

Odds are that if you’re asking the question, you’ve already made up your mind.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Thursday, September 29, 2011

HST change likely to delay new-home sales in BC until its elimination

 

Plans to remove the HST and return to a provincial sales tax mixed with the Goods and Services Tax will probably cause some potential buyers of new homes in British Columbia to delay purchases until 2013, Central 1 Credit Union forecasts.

In a news release Thursday, Central 1 economist Bryan Yu said: "People looking at new homes priced over $525,000 may very well wait until the tax changes lower the 12 per cent hit they face."

The HST added provincial tax to new housing on top of GST and $525,000 was the upper limit for a rebate program intended to add no additional tax on homes.

Yu is forecasting that B.C.'s total home sales through the Multiple Listing Service will reach 88,200 units by the end of this year, which is down one per cent from 2010's sales mark.

However, while resale home transactions are forecast to end the year 4.7 per cent ahead of 2010, new home transactions will lag by 26 per cent.

While sales will remain soft, the median price will rise 6.8 per cent to $417,000, Yu said.

"The real estate market will remain stable for the next couple years, weighed down by global economic issues, moderate employment and population growth and changes to mortgage insurance rules," Yu said.

Central 1 forecasts that next year total home sales are expected to increase by about 3.4 per cent, driven by higher new home sales. The resale of existing homes will decline.

Meanwhile, the Canadian Real Estate Association released a report Thursday showing that the sale of existing homes across Canada declined 0.5 per cent in August.

 

On a seasonally adjusted basis, sales totalled to 37,177 units during the month, down from 37,378 in the previous month, the industry group said. However, sales were still up 15.8 per cent from August 2010, on a non-adjusted basis.

The national average home price of $349,916 in August, on a non-adjusted basis, was up 7.7 per cent from a year earlier.

"[Economic] headwinds will likely persist until, and indeed after, fiscal quagmires in the U.S. and Europe are resolved. In the meantime, the Bank of Canada will have ample reason to delay raising interest rates further, which is supportive for the Canadian housing market."

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Vancouver celebrates 125th birthday with street party

The City of Vancouver officially turns 125 years of age on Wednesday and thousands of people are expected to turn out for a giant street party downtown by the Olympic cauldron.

The free events are scheduled to run from 2 p.m. to 10 p.m. and include street hockey, live music, video and light installations. Vancouver Mayor and other dignitaries will also be on hand to cut up a massive birthday cake and light the Olympic cauldron.

About 8,000 people are expected at the celebrations and city staff are recommending anyone coming down take public transit, bike or walk to the outdoor plaza next to the Vancouver Convention Centre. Donations to the Food Bank are also being accepted at the site.

Aging and energy key to future

As the city celebrates its past, urban planners are already predicting what the city will be like in coming decades.

The city has frequently been ranked as one of the most livable in the world and one of the best places to visit, but two issues — energy consumption and an aging population — will have the biggest impact on Vancouver's future development, said UBC Professor of Landscape Architecture Patrick Condon.

"The over-65 demographic increases by 250 per cent," and will become the single largest population group in the city, said Condon.

'If you came back here in 50 years, the place would be recognizable certainly, but might have twice as many dwelling units.'— Professor of Landscape Architecture Patrick Condon

He said another dramatically increasing demographic will be db_Vancouver_BC__000901S-1_No_111adults who choose not to have children.

"Those two groups tend to need smaller units and seem to appreciate taking advantage of urban amenities, close to transit, easier to take care of, as opposed to large, single family homes."

Condon said the best place to put that large increase in housing would be along the city's major arteries, like Broadway, Main Street and Dunbar Street.

"That would be the most fundamental change in the city such that if you came back here in 50 years, the place would be recognizable certainly, but might have twice as many dwelling units in it as it does right now."

Condon said the other major issue influencing development in the coming decades would be energy conservation.

Vancouver is working towards a goal of cutting emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 and that means a transportation shift, he said.

"We need a virtually zero greenhouse-gas way of getting around. The transit part of that trip needs to be in some kind of electrified transit."

He said if the city and region plan properly for these two factors, we can expect to see streetcars replacing diesel buses in the coming years.

Courtesy of CBCnews.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Olympic Village Selling Well

 

Olympic Village Selling Well

'Ghostbusters' sell 128 units at Olympic Village

After months of sluggish sales, condos are finally selling at Vancouver's former Olympic athletes' village, with more than half of the re-marketed and re-priced units selling over the opening weekend.

Out of 230 units available for sale at the newly christened Village on False Creek, 128 have sold since Friday. Before it was placed in receivership in November, only 36 condos had sold since the development hit the market in May, despite strong presales of 223 units in 2008.  

Marketer Bob Rennie told reporters that the Village has now lost its "ghost town" image.

"The clouds are rolling away," he said. "I think what we brand our company is ‘Ghostbusters.'"

Twenty units priced at more than $1 million sold this weekend, with the most expensive selling for almost $3 million and the cheapest for $329,900. The average selling price was $778,800.

Buyers have seven days to rescind their offers if they change their minds -- Rennie estimates that between four and 10 per cent of buyers typically rescind their offers.

All of the units sold over the weekend went for the asking price. Since Ernst & Young took over as receiver for the development, Rennie and his marketing team have sliced prices drastically, cutting them by an average of 30 per cent.

 

Rennie credited that move for the heavy sales over the opening weekend.

"I've never had a proximity problem or a product problem, but we did have a pricing problem," he said.

Another 244 waterfront units in the development have been held back from the market -- half were meant to be offered for rent, and the rest would go up for sale at a later date. But Rennie said Tuesday that he would like to hold the rental units so that they can be sold as well.olympicmap

The marketer was hopeful about what the upswing in sales will mean for the $740-million debt on the development owed to the city.

"Between Bob being happier or the taxpayer, the taxpayer has to feel good that things are moving along properly," Rennie said, referring to himself in the third person.

"We're cautiously optimistic that we have stabilized the asset for the taxpayer."

Real estate experts have estimated that the city stands to lose between $150 million and $170 million on the development.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Price of units lower, but still no bargain, expert says

Price of units lower, but still no bargain, expert says

Even at reduced prices, it's unlikely taxpayers will fully recoup $740 million invested in project, according to UBC professor

 

The new prices for condos in the taxpayer-owned Olympic village are more in line with the rest of the real-estate market, but they're still no bargain.

That's the analysis of a real estate expert and a business professor who say it will still take years to fill out the Southeast False Creek project.

And even then, it's unlikely that taxpayers will fully recoup the $740 million they invested in the project through construction financing and land sales.

On Thursday, condo marketer Bob Rennie set the stage for the sale of 230 units in five buildings starting today.

He laid out for reporters and fellow real-estate agents an average price reduction of 30 per cent for the units, which make up about half of the 474 unsold units in the village.

Some units, principally the more expensive ones, have been reduced by as much as 50 per cent, while price cuts on smaller lower-priced units are closer to five and 10 per cent.

But Scott Brown, the vicepresident of residential marketing for Colliers International in Vancouver, said those cuts may not be enough.

"It's definitely come down from where it was, which tells you how far out of reality the prices were. They were really out of whack," he said. "I don't know if they have come down far enough to drive any really serious volume."

Vancouver Olympic Village

Brown said Colliers' market research has shown that threequarters of sales in the area have been for units priced at $650 to $750 per square foot.

But most of the new prices in the Olympic village are still higher than that. 

Brown cited a 1,445-squarefoot two-bedroom unit now offered at $1.3 million. At nearly $900 per square foot, "that's not a deal," he said. "Those prices are not low enough yet where people will say, 'This is such a deal I've got to buy it now.'" Tsur Somerville, a professor at the University of B.C.'s Sauder School of Business, said he thinks Rennie's overall repricing strategy will eventually drive enough sales for the city to recover the remaining $570 million it loaned for construction.

But he's doubtful there's enough residual value left to also cover the outstanding $170 million owed on the city's sale of the land to the project's original owners, Millennium Developments.

"I think it is reasonable to say that it is highly unlikely that the taxpayers of Vancouver will see the full value of the lands the city contributed to the project," he said.

Somerville said the prices are competitive with other built projects in the city but not for those being sold on the basis of pre-sales, where buyers put down a small deposit and have longer to pay. By Thursday, a dozen people had camped outside the sales office, waiting for today's opening sale.

Rennie said the lineup was encouraging and he expects to see a crush of potential buyers on the weekend. However, the lineup pales in comparison to the interest in other condo developments in Metro Vancouver.

On Saturday, Bosa Properties will open its sales centre for its 45-storey 202-unit Sovereign tower in Burnaby's Metrotown.

Earlier this week, more than 400 people lined up and 2,600 signed on to a company website.

The company sent people home after giving them numbers reserving their place in line, said Bosa vice-president Daryl Simpson. He projected that up to 70 per cent of the units, priced at $650 a square foot or less, will be sold by the end of the weekend. Rennie told reporters that demand in the Olympic village can't be compared to pre-sales at other developments, noting he'd sold all but 11 of 540 pre-sale units in Wall Centre False Creek behind the village.

Pre-sale buyers put down 10 to 20 per cent and have up to three years to pay. But with built stock such as the Olympic village, buyers have to complete their sales in 60 or 90 days. For that reason, Rennie expects upwards of 70 per cent of buyers in the village will be people wanting to live there or buying for their family. There is little true investor demand for the units, he said. Brown said he thinks Rennie's prices may only translate into four to eight sales per month. "I don't think necessarily they will do 20 or 30 transactions a month and shoot the lights out."

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun